The Article attached “The Crime of Sexual Harassment: A Comparative study between UAE & French Law” was submitted to be reviewed and has received reviews from the reviewers.
1:- The pdf file has comments and highlights provided by the reviewer. Rewrite and respond to EACH comment and highlight.
2:- The reviewer has also written the following in his review:
“The paper attempts to provide a doctrinal critique of the UAE’s new law prohibiting sexual harassment. The author’s analysis is too superficial. There is no reference to the legislative history of the law, nor any citations to case law in the French legal system despite it serving as the comparator jurisdiction. Instead, the analysis appears to be an abstract issue spotting exercise by the author.
There is no empirical data cited to support the normative argument that the law should be amended to make the penalties more stringent.
It’s unclear why the French system is the comparator jurisdiction here, as opposed to Britain, the US, another Western country, or another Arab country. The author does not explain why French law is relevant to UAE law.
The article needs major revision to strengthen the analysis from one of speculative, abstract description to empirically grounded analysis that utilizes data, cases, and legislative history to support the numerous normative claims made in the article.
There is notably minimal, if any, citation to French cases of sexual harassment or the legislative history of the UAE to illuminate why the law was drafted in a certain way. There is insufficient support for the author’s interpretations of the statutory language.
There are few total sources cited in the article”.
Add the required information and make the necessary changes needed and asked by the reviewer in the above review (1- provide references to the legislative history of the law and citations to case law in French legal system, 2- provide data to support the argument that the law should be amended to make the penalties more stringent, 3- why the French system is the comparator jurisdiction in the article, as opposed
to Britain, the US, another Western country, or another Arab country, 4-why French law is relevant to UAE law, 5- Provide citation to French cases of sexual harassment or the legislative
history of the UAE to illuminate why the law was drafted in a certain
way).
3:- The Article should not be re-written from the begining to the end again. Only write what is asked for in each comment and highlight and what is asked by the reviewer to add, in paragraphs in a separate word file.
4:- Do not write an essay with Abstract, Introduction, Conclusion etc. Just write in paragraphs the information required by the reviewers.

Do you need any assistance with this question?
Send us your paper details now
We'll find the best professional writer for you!

CLICK HERE TO ORDER